![](\"http:\/\/localhost\/rs\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2012\/12\/6666qqq.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
To return to Francis Bacon, he once opined, \u201cThey are ill discoverers that think there is no land, when they can see nothing but sea.\u201d[1] Believers would offer advice to Atheists and Agnostics alike that God exists, whether seen or not, whether desired or not, whether considered proven or not.\u00a0 Argument to the contrary is just a distraction from a reality which will unfold as undeniable truth on a future day of joy for some, deep regret and horror for others.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n A great many people need not await the Day of Judgement to entertain such a conclusion, for all people faced with insurmountable trials find themselves drawn to belief, for when faced with desperate circumstances, Who else do people instinctively call upon other than God?\u00a0 Although few make good on the promises of fidelity made at such moments of desperate appeal, the evidence of the oath remains long after the promises to God are cast aside to lie neglected in the gutters of the memory.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Can anybody help the insincere?\u00a0 Very likely not.\u00a0 The concept of recognizing God and living in satisfaction of His commandments only when, and for as long as, it suits one\u2019s purpose, demonstrates an unwillingness to submit on God\u2019s terms.\u00a0 Take, for example, St. Augustine\u2019s pathetic prayer, \u201cDa mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo<\/em>.\u00a0 (Give me chastity and continency\u2014but not yet!)\u201d[2] Here\u2019s the prayer of a \u2018Saint?<\/em>\u2019 who on one hand was praying to God, and on the other hand wasn\u2019t ready to leave the houses of prostitution, to the compromise of his sexual incontinency.\u00a0 Compare this with the exemplary lives of the disciples of Jesus, who are reported to have deserted infinitely more honorable pursuits when called to follow Christ Jesus.\u00a0\u00a0 These men left their worldly priorities, such as their livelihood of fishing and their obligation of burying the dead, when the truth came to them, without delay to a time of greater personal convenience.\u00a0 The religious might be inclined to comment, \u201cWow!\u00a0 Those are my kind of guys!\u201d\u00a0 The more important understanding, however, is that those appear to be God\u2019s<\/em> \u2018kind of guys.\u2019<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Of course, that was then and this is now.\u00a0 In the present age prophets walk on water, heal lepers, and bid mankind to follow only in the imaginations of those with a view to history.\u00a0 All the same, a lot of people still seek the truth of God and, once recognized, will follow immediately, regardless of the sacrifice required.\u00a0 But first, they must know the truth with certainty.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n So what\u2019s the problem?\u00a0 Simply this: information has never been so readily available, and yet (on the surface at least) never so confusing and religiously obstructive.\u00a0 Most people have been raised with the intellectual tools to root out and identify the inconsistencies and fallacies of the religions predominant within their exposure.\u00a0 Sincere seekers log a certain depth of experience in discrediting various faiths, a few of which are truly twitty cults, but the majority of which are sects claiming to be based upon some version of the Old or New Testaments, but in fact diverging from the balanced and fundamental teachings found therein.\u00a0 After a while, one sect begins to look very much like the others, many times with only shallow doctrinal differences, and almost always with the same questionable foundation.\u00a0 Most such sects have evolved to a modern conglomerate of truths, half-truths (or in other words, half-lies) and solid unadulterated deception.\u00a0 The problem is, mixing truth with falsehood is like mixing beauty with ugliness — it doesn\u2019t work.\u00a0 Any one particular religion is either entirely truthful or to some degree impure.\u00a0 And since God doesn\u2019t error — not even once — if people can\u2019t trust one element of that which is presented as revelation, how can they know which teachings can<\/em> be trusted?\u00a0 Furthermore, many of the religious have difficulty conceiving that God would leave humankind to hang the hereafter on an impure understanding of Him.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n The problem screams in the doctrine-stuffed ears of man that a person cannot mix truth with falsehood and continue to consider the blend to originate from God any more than a person can mix loveliness and ugliness and continue to win beauty pageants.\u00a0 Place a single, hairy, multilobulated mole (not a beauty mark, but a true ugly<\/span><\/em> mark) smack dab in the middle of any picture of facial perfection and what does a person get?\u00a0 Pure, unadulterated \u2018Angelic\u2019 beauty?\u00a0 On the contrary, the end result is the all too human reality of beauty marred.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Place the tiniest of falsehoods in a religion, which is reported to be from a perfect and flawless God, and what is the result?\u00a0 A lot of sincere people walking, for one.\u00a0 But for those who wish to hang on to the canon of a flawed belief system, apologists assume the role of religious cosmetic surgeons.\u00a0 These apologists may succeed in smoothing the uneven surface of scripture by way of doctrinal dermabrasion, but anybody with depth of insight recognizes that the foundational genetics remain faulty.\u00a0 Consequently, while some see straight through the lame attempts at excusing the absurd, many follow anyway.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Amongst those who do choose to embrace a faith, many arrive at their choice by throwing up their hands in frustration and chosing whatever religion suits best or, at the very minimum, offends least.\u00a0 Some file a telepathic communiqu\u00e9 with God to the effect that they are doing the best they can, others rest comfortably on insecure conclusions.\u00a0 Many become Agnostic with regard to all doctrinal faiths, pursuing an internal, personal faith for lack of exposure to a doctrinal belief which is pure and consistently Godly.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Refusal to compromise belief in a perfect and infallible God for a \u2018settle for\u2019 religion possessing shaky foundation and demonstrable doctrinal weaknesses is understandable \u2013 respectable even.\u00a0 After generations of distracting family traditions, centuries of confounding cultural misdirection, and a lifetime of prejudiced propaganda, many Westerners have become spiritually immobilized.\u00a0 On one hand the concept of a pristine, pure religion devoid of adulteration, corruption and, in short, the grimy and fallible hand of religion-engineering man is much sought after, but elusive to Western consciousness.\u00a0 On the other hand, many see too clearly the inconsistencies of any present day religion founded on that with which the West is most familiar\u2014namely the Jewish and Christian Bibles.\u00a0 Some may remain trapped within the narrow confine defined by the horn-tips of this dilemma.\u00a0 Others look deeply into Biblical scriptures and recognize that as the Old Testament predicted the coming of John the Baptist, Christ Jesus and one remaining prophet, so did Christ Jesus predict a prophet to follow himself\u2014one who would bring a message of truth to make all things clear.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, and a variety of other Christian sects claim to fulfill this prophecy with the founder of their flavor of belief.\u00a0 Many others are skeptical and still searching.\u00a0 It is for the latter that this book has been written.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Copyright \u00a9 2007 Laurence B. Brown; used by permission.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n The above excerpt is taken from Dr. Brown\u2019s forthcoming book, MisGod\u2019ed<\/em>, which is expected to be published along with its sequel, God\u2019ed<\/em>.\u00a0 Both books can be viewed on Dr. Brown\u2019s website, www.Leveltruth.com.\u00a0 Dr. Brown can be contacted at BrownL38@yahoo.com<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Footnotes: <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n [1] Bacon, Francis.\u00a0 Advancement of Learning<\/em>.\u00a0 I.vii.5.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n [2] St. Augustine, Confessions<\/em>, bk. viii, ch. 7<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Ref: www.islamreligion.com \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 To return to Francis Bacon, he once opined, \u201cThey are ill discoverers that think there is no land, when they can see nothing but sea.\u201d[1] Believers… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":1448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atheism"],"yoast_head":"\n
<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"