![\"\"](\"http:\/\/localhost\/rs\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2012\/05\/m5ddgol193ym.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Akaria Butrus is buzzing a lot about the verse no.63 of Surat Taha:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Which is in Arabic pronounced as that:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n “Qaloo IN hathani lasahiraniy ureedani an yukhrijakum min ardikum bisihrihima wa yathhaba bitareeqatikumu almuthla’<\/span>‘<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThey said, “Decidedly these two (men) are indeed (both) sorcerers; they would (like) to drive you out of your land by their sorcery, and go away with your exemplary mode (of life).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Butrus said that there is a linguistic mistake that might not done by a student of the third grade. He is telling lies and the reason is that the ayah is written in the quran and read with (IN) diluted from the intensive and not (INNA) the emphatic (stressed) and its known and famous that (IN) is different from (INNA) the stressed .<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n He is telling lies as he utters the ayah in a different way than that in the Quran, then he said it is a linguistic mistake. And when one of the listeners answered him that it is written in the Quran (IN) the diluted and not (INNA) the stressed, this liar answered that Al Qurtuby said that there are some readings with stressing (INNA) and not(IN) and he stresses according to these readings. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n This is another lie, as Al Qurtuby said the one who reads with stress in this ayah must put ” hathani ” in the accusative form to be (INNA hathAIN<\/span> lasaherAIN<\/span>)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n And he didn’t say that some of them stressed and then read what’s after it in the nominative form as this mean liar alleged.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n (IN) diluted from (INNA) the emphatic (stressed) doesn’t put the subject of the nominal sentence in the nominative form and doesn’t put the predicate in the accusative form.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n (IN) comes with different meanings:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n The conditional like in ayah no.6 from Surat Al Tawaba:<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n That is pronounced as:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n ”Wa-IN ahadun mina almushrikeena istajaraka faajirhu hatta yasmaAAa kalama Allahi thumma ablighhu ma\u2019manahu thalika bi-annahum qawmun layaAAlamoon\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cAnd if any one of the polytheists seeks your protection, then grant him protection so that he may hear the words of Allah. Then deliver him to his place of safety. That is because they are people who do not know\u201d.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n -And the same meaning of (Ma) negative:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n ”Wayunthira allatheena qaloo ittakhatha Allahu walada. Ma lahum bihi min AAilmin walali-aba-ihim kaburat kalimatan takhruju min afwahihim IN yaqooloona illa kathiba”.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cAnd to warn the ones who have said, “Allah has taken to Him a child. In no way do they have any knowledge of it, (they) nor their fathers. An odious (Literally: great) word it is, coming out (Literally: going out) of their mouths; decidedly they say nothing except a lie.<\/span>\u201d ( Al Kahaf 4-5).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n And Allah’s saying about Jesus peace be upon him<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n ”IN huwa illa AAabdun anAAamnaAAalayhi wajaAAalnahu mathalan libanee isra-eel”<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cJesus was not but a servant upon whom We bestowed favor, and We made him an example for the Children of Israel<\/span>\u201d.( Az Zukhurf :59).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Here it means (Ma) of negation in the text restricted using exception and negation.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n -And it also comes by the meaning of (yes)<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n like the previously mentioned ayah of Surat Taha :63<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n “ Qaloo IN hathani lasahiraniy ureedani an yukhrijakum min ardikum bisihrihima wa yathhaba bitareeqatikumu almuthla<\/span>”<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThey said, “Decidedly these two (men) are indeed (both) sorcerers; they would (like) to drive you out of your land by their sorcery, and go away with your exemplary mode (of life)<\/span>\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n And the story of the Bedouin who came to the son of Abullah Ibn Al Zobair, may Allah be pleased with both of them, asking him for money but he noticed that he had no right to take money so he didn’t give him any. But he insists on asking him for money and Ibn Al Zobair refused to give him. So the Bedouin said:”May Allah curse the camel led me to you”. He answered him: ”IN wa rakabaha(yes and its rider)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n These are ten lies, and unless the occasion had been an article, I would have exceeded passing the forty hundred but this is enough to judge Butrus as a liar. Akaria Butrus is buzzing a lot about the verse no.63 of Surat Taha: Which is in Arabic pronounced as that: “Qaloo IN hathani lasahiraniy ureedani an yukhrijakum min ardikum bisihrihima… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":748,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-misconceptions"],"yoast_head":"\n
<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"